Tuesday, April 26, 2011

"Does God Exist...?? Brilliantly answered by a Genius... " - Really???

Recently, I happened across a youtube video titled "Does God Exist...?? Brilliantly answered by a Genius... " In it, apparently, Albert Einstein, as a boy, argued for the existence of God. It does not take a genius to see how the argument is neither "brilliant" nor an "answer" and could not have been put forward by a "genius." This is insulting on so many levels to one of the greatest minds and people should stop attributing such a fallacious argument to him. Here are the reasons why:

  • Einstein did not believe in a personal God. Neither was he an atheist. He was an agnostic. The following are quotes from him.
    - "It was, of course, a lie what you read about my religious convictions, a lie which is being systematically repeated. I do not believe in a personal God and I have never denied this but have expressed it clearly."
             Albert Einstein, The Human Side. Princeton University Press. p. 43.
    - "My position concerning God is that of an agnostic. I am convinced that a vivid consciousness of the primary importance of moral principles for the betterment and ennoblement of life does not need the idea of a law-giver, especially a law-giver who works on the basis of reward and punishment."
             Albert Einstein in a letter to M. Berkowitz, October 25, 1950
    -
    "I believe in Spinoza's God who reveals himself in the orderly harmony of what exists, not in a God who concerns himself with fates and actions of human beings."
            Cable reply to Rabbi Herbert S. Goldstein
  • The word Heat is a noun. It is used to describe an observable occurrence. Cold is an adjective and it is used to describe the state of things and its temperature.  Light is also used here as a noun, and dark is an adjective that describes the state of illumination one can perceive. It is therefore a play on words to suggest that those are opposites of each other, and because of the absence of the former, the latter "entity" does not exist. If I could spot this, Einstein (who is by many, many, many degrees smarter than me) would not have postulated such a fallacious argument.
  • Even if one were to disregard the earlier points made here, the argument proposed in the video is circular in nature. The assumption, "God" exist, must be accepted in order for the argument to make any sense.
    Argument for the existence of "God" in the video - Evil is the absence of "God".
                                                                              - therefore "God exist".
    Allow yourself to think logically about the argument and you will see how it does not make sense.

This, to me, is a sad example of the gullibility of modern society. Attach a famous enough name, and one can get by with a moronic argument. And to the atheists who claim Einstein as one your own, shame on you that stoop to the level of the fundamentalists!!

Sighs.

Saturday, April 16, 2011

"why hast thou, in whose existence I believe not, forsaken me?"

One often hears of the power of prayer, if one has many christian friends. Yet time and time again, it seems there is something wrong with the power of prayer. It seems that either the connection is not working or that the prayer has been taken out by the divine spam filter. Yet Christians still insist that prayer is an effective and powerful tool. However, before taking a look at prayer and its perceived power, the question firstly is, what is prayer?

Tefilah is the Hebrew word for prayer. It is derived from the root Pe-Lamed-Lamed and the word l'hitpalel, meaning to judge oneself. The Yiddish word meaning "pray" is "daven," which ultimately comes from the same Latin root as the English word "divine" and emphasizes to whom prayer is directed.
Merriam-Webster defines prayer as a (1) : an address (as a petition) to God or a god in word or thought (2) : a set order of words used in praying b : an earnest request or wish.
The word pray can be traced back to its Latin roots precārī which meant "ask for, entreat, pray" and the noun prayer can be traced back to precārius which, interestingly enough, is also the source of the word precarious - depending on chance or caprice. Coincidence? 

Anyways, back to prayer and its perceived power. Prayer according to christians is one of the most powerful tools they have. They can pray for souls, pray that traffic will be smooth, pray that eyes will open to see "the truth"(usually through bad things happening), pray for the hamster not to die, pray for less pain, pray for more money.  Let's take a step back and look at it objectively.  Assuming the existence of such a being, why would a "God" listen? They say he does. Imagine if he really do. Won't he find the human race exceptionally whiny about everything? Who amongst you love listening to whiny people? The christian "God" definitely does not. Just go read the many times he has punished the whinny hebrews in the bible.

How about if, according to the christians, he does what you pray to him for? Suspend the laws of physics? Of entropy? Make others late for work? Take money from others and give it to you? Oh right, "he moves in mysterious way." Seriously? If prayer works, shouldn't all praying ones pray for less poverty in improvised nations? Or how about praying for those who lack the basic necessities such as clean water, food, and shelter? Oh right, "we can't pray for those who won't help themselves and work hard." Then why don't you wake up a little earlier instead of praying for less traffic? Or a little harder for more money? Since, one can pray about the lack of x, presumably, one can also pray for the abundance of x. Yet I never hear, "'God', I have much money/comfort/looks/abilities, take some away and give it to the rest."

Still, there are many people who claim that "'God' answers prayers" with the proof of "I prayed and it happened." That begs the question, assuming I subscribe to your premise, 'God' exist, how do you know beyond any reasonable doubt that it was your "God" whom, by answering your prayer, made it happened? Is there one single shred of objective evidence that it was the 'God' you prayed to that did it, and not something that would have happened otherwise?  Behavioral Psychologist B. F. Skinner  has proven through his studies of the human mind, that it (the human mind) seeks relationships between events and finds them even when they are not present. A person praying for x and x happening does not necessarily mean that the event( x) happened because you prayed. If that be the case, many of the other gods that christians claim are false would be true based on the very same proof the christains claim verifies their prayer answering 'God'.

I think "God's" job to answer prayers is a pretty sweet deal for him and anyone would love to be in a similar position in day-to-day living. Imagine that I have been asked to do a task which, according to all my references and all the paper qualifications I have, is as easy as finding out the sum of 0+0; plus I have promised to do it.  If I do it, I get massive amounts of praise and pretty good $$. If I do not do the task or fail at it in some way, I need not find any reasons or excuses as those who requested it from me would come up with their very own. "He moves in mysterious ways." "His thoughts are not my thoughts, neither his ways my ways." "I am unworthy of his help." "He is not a divine vending machine." Does this not describe the "God' that his followers ardently pray to and insist we all do the same? How is it possible that they/we do not see that this is one crazy ramble of an unsound mind?


There are the minority who do more than they pray, but for the vast majority, prayer only seeks to alleviate their guilt and/or laziness. "I prayed for ______, " and they think "so I have done my part." Often are the times one hears the "I prayed that 'God' will_______" said with such self-righteousness that it makes the blood boil and causes one to want to slap them really hard across that "sincerely" smiley mask these "prayer-warriors" put on. And if one were to reply, "I know you prayed, but what have you actually done?" Oh my, puppy eyes will come out, followed by indignation/exasperation, as if their prayers were more than enough already. I was once one. I feel ashamed.



I have, on purpose, not included any of the findings from experiments on the effectiveness of prayer due to the controversy surrounding them. However, if you were so inclined to read the findings, I would suggest reading the findings of the double blind experiment conducted by Harvard Medical School, which is an impartial and objective study of the subject. It was funded by Templeton Foundation and included many christian doctors as investigators.  For humor, read the arguments against the findings by fundamentalists. I wonder if they would have raised the same "issues" if it had turned out in their favor.


Thursday, April 14, 2011

The Insanely Sane One

"I don't want to believe. I want to know." -Carl Sagan

I am tossing my hat into the rink for the debate on the possibility of the existence of a supernatural being or aka God. The focus here, for the time being, would be the judeo-christian take on an interpersonal God and the belief that such a God exist.  I do not have many letters before or after my name, but what I do have is a brain and a heart, which is all that is needed in my search to know. There is an answer, and my invitation extended, is to join me on the humble quest to know. 

I would like to introduce myself a little so that I will not be misunderstood as one of those outsiders who were never part of the faith, bring critical of what he does not know. From the early age of three, I was brought up in an ultra-conservative christian background after my parents became members of a church. Childhood consisted of church life, family life, and school life. I believed everything wholeheartedly, from Creation to the End of the world, the existence of a heaven and hell, salvation through Jesus, baptism by immersion, the indwelling of the Holy Spirit, the power and need of prayer, a God who answers, etc... Reading materials consisted almost solely of the bible (KJV, Amplified, Wuest Translation, etc..), bible study guides, AW Tozer,  Dave Hunt, John MacArthur - just to name a few. Things changed when the church removed us from its membership, and I began to question. That is the start, isn't it?

I was asked recently what do I believe in. I believe neither the existence or the non existence of gods. That being said, most of the popular definition of 'god' are demonstrably false and hence, this blog. I am not an agnostic as agnosticism deals with the lack of knowledge and the inability to reach absolute truth and not beliefs. If I have to put myself in a category, I would be an atheist - one who lacks belief in gods. I am unconvinced either way, at the moment. I do believe there is a source/catalyst for life. I would not call that source/catalyst for life, "a God". I believe that evolution is a valid answer to the question of how we all became not of how it all started. I am open to believing otherwise should there be irrefutable proof presented either way. This is my quest - to know and share.